Governor Jared Polis vetoed a significant rideshare safety bill that would have implemented stricter regulations for rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft. The bill, which passed overwhelmingly in the Colorado legislature, proposed tougher background checks for drivers and the ability for riders to pursue legal action in case of injuries during a ride. However, Polis argued that the bill would impose “unworkable regulations” on Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) and potentially jeopardize their continued operation in Colorado.
Concerns Over Impact on Rideshare Companies
Polis justified his veto by expressing concerns about the potential operational consequences of the bill. The governor pointed out that Uber had previously threatened to pull out of the state if the bill became law, and Lyft also voiced concerns that the regulations could “leave riders less safe” and create uncertainty regarding their future in Colorado.
“I want to make sure that Uber, Lyft, and others will be able to continue to operate in Colorado, but are far more accountable for the safety of riders and drivers,” Polis said in a letter to the General Assembly. “These services go beyond convenience by providing essential means of travel for many Coloradans and improve public safety primarily by reducing driving under the influence.”
Background of the Bill and Supporters' Criticism
Rep. Jenny Willford, one of the bill’s primary sponsors, was especially vocal in her disappointment over the veto. Willford, who had filed a lawsuit against Lyft after allegedly being sexually assaulted while using the platform, argued that the bill was a necessary step forward for rider safety. She criticized the veto as an example of the governor siding with industry concerns rather than protecting Colorado residents.
“If the Governor or his staff had chosen to engage earlier than the Monday before Sine Die, we could have addressed these issues,” Willford said in a statement. “We made good-faith amendments throughout the process, including at the Governor’s request. What we needed was a partner — not a veto pen.”
The bill had been subject to multiple changes in the legislature, including significant amendments to its provisions. One of the most controversial aspects of the original bill — requiring mandatory dash cameras and audio recording of all rides — was altered to allow drivers and riders the option to opt in to recording, rather than making it a requirement.
Drivers employed by Transportation Network Companies generally do not have to pass background checks any way. So Polis stating these companies could be impacted is basically saying these companies would have to be more safe, and that would cost them money. So just another example of putting profit over protection in my opinion.
Survivor Advocate
Polis Cites Privacy and Operational Challenges
Governor Polis expressed concerns about the remaining language in the bill regarding audio-visual recording. Despite the amendments, Polis argued that the bill still strongly suggested mandatory recording, which he noted would conflict with state privacy laws. He also pointed out operational difficulties related to data retention and security protocols, which would complicate compliance for TNCs and the Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
“Drivers and riders are entitled to privacy, and while I appreciate the movement on this issue, the net effect of the remaining language in the bill still strongly suggests making recording mandatory, which will put this law in direct conflict with other state privacy laws,” Polis explained in his letter.
Governor Directs Action to Improve Rideshare Safety
Despite vetoing the bill, Governor Polis directed various parts of his administration to take immediate action to improve rideshare safety in the state. He instructed the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) to work with the bill’s sponsors to identify key policy objectives and collaborate with the PUC to strengthen rules around driver impersonation and penalties.
Polis also called for the PUC to conduct audits of rideshare companies to ensure compliance with background check requirements. While Polis acknowledged the importance of addressing rideshare safety, he emphasized that the current system is inadequate and called on TNCs to take additional steps to protect riders and drivers, including improving transparency and preventing bad actors from operating.
Next Steps in Rideshare Safety Debate
The veto of this bill has left many advocates and lawmakers frustrated, particularly those who see it as a necessary step toward improving public safety. Critics of the veto argue that rideshare companies must be held accountable for the safety of their passengers, and stronger regulations are needed to protect Colorado residents. As the debate continues, Polis has challenged the rideshare industry to implement more rigorous measures to safeguard users.
Survivors of Rideshare Abuse Have Legal Rights
If you or someone you know has been the victim of sexual assault, harassment, or abuse while using a rideshare service, it is important to know your legal rights. At Helping Survivors, we can connect you with experienced attorneys who specialize in cases involving rideshare abuse. Even if you haven’t come forward yet, there is still time to seek justice. Contact us today for a confidential consultation, and let us help guide you through the legal process.
